Explain the right to constitutional remedies given in the Indian Constitution.

by

The Right to Constitutional Remedies in India: A Comprehensive Explanation

Introduction:

The Indian Constitution, a landmark document guaranteeing fundamental rights to its citizens, is incomplete without a robust mechanism for their enforcement. Article 32, enshrined within Part III (Fundamental Rights), grants the right to constitutional remedies, often considered the “heart and soul” of the Constitution. This right, guaranteed by the Supreme Court, allows citizens to approach the court directly if their fundamental rights are violated. B.R. Ambedkar, the chief architect of the Constitution, famously described Article 32 as the “most important article” because it provides a mechanism to enforce all other fundamental rights. Without this provision, the fundamental rights would remain mere declarations, lacking practical efficacy.

Body:

1. Scope of Article 32:

Article 32 empowers the Supreme Court to issue writs – orders from a court – for the enforcement of fundamental rights. These writs include:

  • Habeas Corpus: “To have the body.” Used to challenge unlawful detention. It ensures that a person is not imprisoned illegally without due process.
  • Mandamus: “We command.” Directs a public authority to perform a mandatory duty. For example, it can be used to compel a government body to fulfill its obligation to provide clean drinking water.
  • Prohibition: Restricts a lower court from exceeding its jurisdiction.
  • Certiorari: “To be certified.” Used to quash an order passed by a lower court or tribunal that is deemed illegal or beyond its jurisdiction.
  • Quo Warranto: “By what authority?” Challenges the right of a person to hold a public office.

2. Enforcement Power of the Supreme Court:

The Supreme Court’s power under Article 32 is not merely limited to issuing writs. It has the power to:

  • Declare laws unconstitutional: If a law infringes upon fundamental rights, the Supreme Court can declare it void. This power of judicial review is a cornerstone of the Indian legal system. Numerous landmark judgments, like Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973), have shaped the interpretation of fundamental rights and the limits of legislative power.
  • Award compensation: The court can award compensation to victims of human rights violations.
  • Issue directions and orders: The court can issue directions and orders to ensure the enforcement of fundamental rights.

3. Limitations on Article 32:

While Article 32 is a powerful tool, it is not without limitations:

  • Fundamental Rights only: The writ jurisdiction under Article 32 is limited to the enforcement of fundamental rights. It cannot be used to enforce ordinary legal rights.
  • Public interest litigation (PIL): While PILs have expanded the reach of Article 32, they are subject to certain limitations and can be misused. The court has developed guidelines to ensure that PILs are filed genuinely and not for frivolous purposes.
  • Judicial discretion: The Supreme Court has the discretion to refuse to entertain a petition if it deems it frivolous or lacking merit.

4. Relationship with Article 226:

Article 226 grants similar powers to High Courts. However, Article 32 is considered superior as it directly addresses the enforcement of fundamental rights and is not subject to the limitations imposed on High Courts’ jurisdiction. The Supreme Court’s interpretation of fundamental rights often sets precedents for High Courts.

Conclusion:

The right to constitutional remedies under Article 32 is a vital safeguard of fundamental rights in India. It empowers citizens to seek redressal for violations of their rights, ensuring that the promises enshrined in the Constitution are not mere words but actionable guarantees. While limitations exist, the Supreme Court’s proactive role in interpreting and enforcing Article 32 has strengthened the protection of fundamental rights. Moving forward, it is crucial to maintain the integrity of Article 32 by preventing its misuse and ensuring its accessibility to all citizens, regardless of their socio-economic background. This will further strengthen the rule of law and promote a just and equitable society, upholding the constitutional values of liberty, equality, and justice.

[/lockercat]HPPCS Notes brings Prelims and Mains programs for HPPCS Prelims and HPPCS Mains Exam preparation. Various Programs initiated by HPPCS Notes are as follows:- For any doubt, Just leave us a Chat or Fill us a querry––